01
Situation
- Engineers rebuild similar drawings for every order instead of designing.
- The same part and revision data is typed into CAD, PDM and ERP, and the three drift apart.
- Release checks depend on who remembers what to look for.
Machine builders
Example industry study
A drawing is an instruction to the floor. When it is generated from the 3D model, the routine parts (views, sizes, hole tables, title block) come out in seconds. What matters is the check: every number on the sheet compared with the design, and an engineer signing before release.
01
02
03
Every figure says where it comes from. Vendor claims are marked as vendor claims.
2.2–3.1 h
Time skilled staff took to draw each of three machined parts with 53 to 84 dimensions.
142 of 142
Dimensions our generator got right across three sample parts, each drawn in under a second. Sample parts we designed, not client work.
1 missing depth
In the NIST study, a single hole depth left off a drawing got a whole lot of parts scrapped and remade.
54%
Share of their time engineers say they spend actually designing.
Try it on sample data
Pick a sample part and watch the drawing build itself. Every number is checked against the design, next to how long it takes by hand.
Try the demoEnter your monthly drawings, quotes, first articles and part data work. See the hours a year it takes, what that costs, and the sales it would take to earn the same profit.
Try the demoPick a sample part and see the checks a generated drawing must pass before it reaches the floor, including a named approver.
Try the demoGood to know
An example built from what we see in manufacturing and from published figures. It is not a client story.
How we would do it
Every study follows the same steps: find the bottleneck, redesign the work, test the fix, and keep the math where you can check it.